Amidst the current groundswell of concern over our food comes the film, ‘Food, Inc.’. Opening tomorrow at the Film Forum, it can be seen as a companion to Michael Pollan’s ‘The Omnivore’s Dilemma’, which was used as reference material for the film, (and indeed, he is featured in it and is a special consultant). Produced and made by Eric Schlosser of ‘Fast Food Nation’ fame, and Robert Kenner, ‘Food, Inc.’ takes a hard look at food production in this country. If you were ever ambivalent about where your food comes from, you won’t be after seeing this film.
An important film, it is a damning indictment of the big agri-business side of the food industry, Kenner exposes everything that is wrong with it, how it came to pass, and the extraordinary toll we are paying – physically, environmentally, and societally. He connects the dots and calls out the parties complicit in depriving us of informed consent, of keeping us in the dark, and of making us sick. He believes, as do I, that it is our right to know where our food comes from and how it is produced. In a world where so much of it is processed, is it any wonder there is so much obesity, heart disease and diabetes in America?
Food is not only integral to our survival, it inspires great joy and passion, and also impacts our health. We are what we eat, and we vote with our mouths and dollars (at least) three times a day. One of the best ways to turn the tide against big agri-business is to join a CSA, which stands for community supported agriculture. An overtly political act, it supports local farms and provides a beautiful bounty of farm-fresh, seasonal and organic produce. I first joined one about 14 years ago when I lived in San Francisco, and it was revelatory. It introduced me to a host of vegetables I mostly likely would never have bought left to my own devices, and induced me to learn how to cook vegetables beyond steaming. All this while lowering my carbon footprint, and at a ridiculously reasonable price.
It is a win-win-win all around.
As Greenpeace U.K.’s campaign against Nobu heats up with the targeting Friday of Nobu LA, I offer a few thoughts.
Regardless of what you think about Greenpeace U.K.’s tactics (and I will go on record as saying that I support them and have worked with Greenpeace in the U.S. in the past), they are clearly proving tremendously effective. Between Greenpeace U.K. and the new documentary on overfishing, ‘The End of the Line’, they have brought rightful pressure to bear on Nobu and have jump-started a greater awareness among the public (and, it seems, celebrities). Pret A Manger, the sandwich chain with locations in the U.K. and the U.S., announced in the last couple of days that it will now serve only skipjack tuna caught with pole and line, and Marks and Spencer, the venerated retailer, has also said they would only source pole and line caught tuna (they have never stocked bluefin). Pole and line is one of the most sustainable methods of fishing.
Greenpeace U.K. has been targeting Nobu since last year, with early attempts at a dialogue rebuffed, or resulting in servers and management being vague about what kind of tuna they were serving. It was in the fall, when Greenpeace U.K. performed DNA tests on Nobu’s tuna conclusively determining that it was Atlantic bluefin, that the restaurant agreed to put the notation on the menus, albeit only in its London restaurants. They have stated that they would do away with bluefin altogether if the fish were banned by the U.S. government, and the General Manager, Richie Notar, has stated that he is desirous of removing bluefin from the menu but that his Japanese chefs won’t let him. Nobu is unmistakably taking a reactive position, not willing to take any action unless forced to by either the government or the market.
The issue is simple - consumers need to stop eating bluefin. While Nobu London’s menus state that their tuna is ‘environmentally challenged’, (a clear bid to avoid the word endangered), Nobu’s blaming its popularity on Japanese patrons evidences their greed. For them to say that they are educating their customers by noting its status is not enough. And their refusal to acknowledge their part is disingenuous. They are writing the end of their own ability to serve bluefin into the (near) future. For the record, I have dined at Nobu on multiple occasions and am a fan too - but I strongly feel they need to come out as the leader - as the most high-profile sushi restaurant in the world, they have the potential to shift the entire debate and have a major hand in allowing the bluefin to restock.
For those who feel that Greenpeace U.K.’s actions are self-aggrandizing, it is well worth pointing out on whose behalf Greenpeace U.K. is working - it isn’t an individual, group or company - it is the environment and the protection of resources for future generations. I am someone who is deeply passionate about great food and also cares deeply about where it comes from, so I understand the passion that people can have for bluefin. But do we really want to see the extinction of this magnificent and important fish on our watch? I also genuinely care about the protection of the planet and its resources for future generations. Do the people who eat bluefin with willful disregard have children? Do they wish for their children to be able to experience what they have? And what kind of planet do they wish to leave for them?
As for Greenpeace U.K.’s actions being alienating, I think that it’s a fine line, and that there are differing levels of tolerance. Previous politeness has proven ineffective. Dire circumstances require dire actions. As Nobu faces a growing public relations disaster, with other large corporations already taking leadership positions, what will it take to make them see the light?
If you’re interested in voicing your displeasure with Nobu’s policies directly, Greenpeace U.K. has provided contact information for Nobu Matsuhisa, the chef and owner at Nobu. You can be sure I have a letter on the way.
Nobu Matsuhisa
1 323-852-0811
matsuhisa@mindspring.com
Click on the post title for the trailer of Jeff Parker’s film on Newport Beach surf culture in the early 80s.
Newport Beach was my stomping grounds when I was a young girl growing up in Southern California. I remember shopping at I. Magnin, the Red Balloon and At-Ease in Fashion Island for school clothes with my mother. I remember the John Wayne airport when it was only a tarmac and a parking lot separated by a chain link fence. A tennis family, we spent many a weekend at the Newport Beach Tennis and Swim Club, though as I failed miserably at tennis, even after years of lessons, I was much more comfortable in the pool. It was here that the swim coach approached my mother and said I should consider being on the swim team - something I eventually did in high school. We later joined the Balboa Bay Club, and I believe we were one of the earliest Asian families admitted. My first two jobs were on Balboa Island, and I would later work at the Fiorucci store that opened at Fashion Island. (I know all you fashion people out there are rightly saying – WTF? What a seriously misguided location for Fiorucci – and indeed it did not last long there.)
As I got a little older, it was all I could do to spend every spare moment at and on the beach. I remember the first time my mother let me go to the beach with my girlfriends – something she was very hesitant about, even though she had no problem letting my brother go by himself. Not sure what that was all about, but I think it had something to do with what she regarded as ne’er do well surfers. Didn’t she know that aside from getting a tan, they were the whole point? My friends and I used to check out every car with surfracks, (they were usually VWs – ghias, fastbacks, buses, squarebacks - and BMW 2002s) to see if the drivers were hot. And I admit to having a brief relationship with a rather well known and renowned local surf photographer considerably older than I. Actually, he was probably exactly what my mother was afraid of.
From the Santa Ana River jetties to the Newport Harbor entrance, most of the streets are numbered. And the streets to be at (at least for me and my crew, back in the day), were 32nd and 54th Streets. 54th was a popular local surfing spot – and the surfers making all the noise in those days were Danny Kwock, Jeff Parker and Preston Murray, among others. They were brash, full of attitude, sported bright, geometric color blocked trunks and boards - and they rocked. Though I only met them tangentially, the sight of Danny in Maui and Sons trunks especially, is permanently seared in my memory. Little did I realize at the time that this was the epicenter of a revolution in surf culture and surf style.
There’s a new film by one of that original crew, Jeff Parker, ‘Echo Beach’, which puts it all in perspective. Though I never knew it as such, Echo Beach refers to the stretch of beach from 52nd Street to 56th Streets. The film tells the story of how this colorful band and the spirit they embodied, made their mark and made Newport Beach not only an international surfing mecca, but the birthplace for the beginnings of the nascent global surf industry, home to Quiksilver USA, Schroff, Stussy, RipCurl, Wave Tools and McCoy. They established Orange County as the focal point of the surf industry and a worldwide influencer of youth culture.
I have not seen it yet, but you can be sure I’m attempting to find out if they will be touring the East Coast. Especially now that the image of Orange County and Newport Beach is so obnoxious and over-the-top, I’m dying to see this slice of a nostalgic view of the Newport Beach I remember.
In the last couple of months, with the world’s attention growing over pirate activity in the Gulf of Aden, there has been scant media coverage delving into the root causes of the piracy, and certainly none in mainstream corporate-owned outlets. Johann Hari wrote an excellent article in The Independent UK in early January, Alternet published a piece yesterday, and Democracy Now! featured an interview this morning with Mohamed Abshir Waldo, a Kenyan of Somali origin, who also wrote a article titled ‘The Two Piracies in Somalia: Why the World Ignores the Other?’
The truth of the matter is that the ‘pirate’ activity originated as a response to almost two decades of illegal foreign dumping and illegal foreign fishing which have devastated Somali waters. The abundant fish in their waters, their own sustainability, and their livelihoods have been, and continue to be, stolen from them, and at the same time, their waters have been poisoned by the international community – Spain, Switzerland, Italy, Malaysia, India, Egypt, Russia, Korea, Greece, the Phillipines, the Taiwanese, and no doubt a few others, are all guilty of one or the other of these transgressions.
With the Somalian quasi-government in conflict, weakened by strife and wars, there has been no true functioning government since the overthrow of Siyad Barre in 1991. As such, the people of Somalia have had no recourse or proper place to report the dumping of toxic wastes (including nuclear), which have caused diseases, ailments and cancers among them. Efforts to address illegal fishing have been unsuccessful largely because those benefitting from it the most have been less than willing to support UN resolutions because of how it might interfere with sovereignty over their own waters. To rub further salt in the wound, UN Resolution 1838, which allows any States with naval vessels into the area to protect their respective fleets, essentially gives said States the ability to continue their illegal dumpling and fishing under protection.
The Somali people, tired of being taken advantage of by the global community, and faced with no recourse, have taken matters into their own hands. As this past weeks’ events have unfolded, it’s clear that an escalation is possible, and with it, the likelihood of a potential chemical or oil spill that would further damage and deplete their resources.
President Obama, in response to the piracy, said “We have to ensure that those who commit acts of piracy are held accountable for their crimes.” The Somali people would possibly be comforted if they knew it would apply to those countries which are committing the more egregious acts of piracy in their waters, but it is doubtful that will be the case. Senator Russ Feingold seems to be the only one who has a grasp on the depth of the issue, calling for a comprehensive strategy towards a central authority, (certainly no small feat), saying, “People are talking about this as a piracy issue. That is not the core issue here. It is a symptom of a disunified government.”
While most Somali people support the dire measures they have been forced to resort to, they also desire a peaceful and just resolution to the matter. And admittedly, what started out as a targeted campaign against transgressors has turned into a no holds barred attack against any ship in their waters.
It was reported by Mr. Waldo that another ship was captured yesterday. One that dumped two huge containers at sea when they saw the ‘pirates’ coming. The containers did not sink, and are now in custody of the Somalis. They have invited the international community to come, see and investigate for themselves.
Apparently the White House (organic) garden has conventional agriculture up in arms. On March 26th, the Mid America CropLife Association, an industry group representing big agri-business corporations, wrote to Michelle Obama to ‘encourage you to recognize the role conventional agriculture plays in the U.S. in feeding the ever-increasing population, contributing to the U.S. economy and providing a safe and economical food supply”.
In my opinion, they are opening themselves up to ridicule by sending the letter in the first place. But then they really let loose a couple of gems. “Much of the food considered not wholesome or tasty is the result of how it is stored or prepared rather than how it is grown”. And “Farmers and ranchers are the first environmentalists, maintaining and improving the soil and natural resources to pass onto future generations”. Really?
Remember we are talking about the defense of produce grown with poisonous pesticides as well as genetically modified organisms. So no, it IS about how it is grown, and a conventional farmer who uses pesticides is NOT an environmentalist.
Click on post title for the original article from The Observer UK.
Will Ken Saro-Wiwa’s murder finally be avenged?
Fourteen years after the murder of Goldman Environmental Prize-winner Ken Saro-Wiwa, it looks like Shell oil may finally have to answer for its hand in his execution.
As president of the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP), an organization whose purpose was to protect the environmental and human rights of the Ogoni people in the Niger Delta, Saro-Wiwa’s organizing efforts were so effective that he was deemed a threat to the oil operations which had decimated Ogoni lands and deprived its people of their livelihoods since 1958 when Royal Dutch/Shell first struck oil. For organizing peacefully in demanding a share of the estimated $30 billion in oil revenues, remediation of lands, and compensation for damage, he was arrested on questionable charges and hanged after a farce of a trial by the Nigerian military government that was widely condemned by the international human rights community.
No multinational has ever been found guilty of human rights abuses, but it was common knowledge amongst environment activists at the time that Shell and the Nigerian government were working together to neutralize him. On May 26th, Shell and one of its senior executives will face charges in NY Federal court that they were complicit in such abuses, including subsidizing terror campaigns at the hands of security forces in the Delta region, and that they attempted to influence the trial that led to his execution.
Jenny Green, a senior lawyer with The New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights, was instrumental in bringing this case to court. She said, “MOSOP was formed to stand up to multinationals and the dictatorship that acted hand-in-hand. This is a significant moment, because it says you can’t act with impunity.”
I am hopeful that her efforts may finally win some small justice, avengement and satisfaction for Saro-Wiwa’s family and the Ogoni people.
ADDENDUM: Click HERE for a short video on the case by the Center for Constitutional Rights and EarthRights International, who are serving as co-counsel on this landmark case.
There’s an interesting article in the April 6th New Yorker about David de Rothschild’s Plastiki boat expedition. For those of you who may not yet have heard of it, this boat, made mostly of discarded plastic bottles filled with dry-ice to pressurize them, will be sailed from San Francisco to Sydney, through the Great Pacific Garbage Patch in an effort to bring attention to plastics pollution, and to encourage the exploration of creative uses of our post-consumer waste stream.
His efforts are lofty and admirable, but I was put off by his attitude towards Charles Moore, the discoverer of the Garbage Patch, and researcher who has made numerous trips to study the extent of the plastic pollution there, and one who has published a number of papers on the subject. (Click HERE to read my earlier post on Moore).
Moore’s Algalita Marine Research Foundation has been working on the issue since 2003, and I would daresay he has been the pioneer in raising awareness about plastics pollution in our waterways and oceans. Because Algalita had a project called the Junk Raft which launched last summer, well before the Plastiki’s scheduled launch for this summer, de Rothschild complains bitterly about being ‘nudged out’ in the competition for corporate sponsors. Later in the article, he takes apparent glee at news of Algalita’s setbacks.
Pretty ballsy for a relative Johnny come lately to the issue. And for someone who does not fully acknowledges the benefits his name and status give him over Moore, a bit disingenuous as well. Frankly, he comes off quite condescending towards Moore and Algalita, which is unfortunate, as I feel it detracts from his own message.
So I’ve fired off another letter – to the editor of the New Yorker, which amazingly, never even mentioned that Moore has made multiple trips to the Garbage Patch.
Here it is:
To the Editor:
Both Charles Moore and David de Rothschild deserve major kudos for their commitment and passion to the issue of plastics pollution, but it is unfortunate that de Rothschild is unable to find his way to a more conciliatory position towards Moore. Though De Rothschild acknowledges that he first heard about the issue through Moore’s work, he is disingenuous and inelegant in not acknowledging that indeed, it was Moore who inspired where he ultimately took his own project to, and that the benefits accorded his name, status, savvy and sophistication at the media and sponsorship game have played a huge role in driving interest in his project.
He would do well to give the proper respect due to Moore and Algalita, who have made multiple research trips to the Garbage Patch, advocating on the issue in relative obscurity for over ten years, instead of being a late-comer complaining of being ‘nudged’ out, even as he takes the message to another level. For longtime supporters and admirers of Moore, de Rothschild’s attitude detracts from his own worthy goals,
They are both making important contributions, and doing substantive and meaningful work whose ends are not mutually exclusive.
Sincerely,
Lelaine Lau